#501: Sex-based Training Recommendations: Evidence-based or Hype? – David Nolan, PhD

In Podcasts by Danny LennonLeave a Comment

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Guest Information
  3. Overview
  4. Related Resources
  5. Premium Content
    • Detailed Study Notes
    • Transcript


The field of research exploring sex differences in exercise response has yielded intriguing findings, shedding light on the complex interplay between biology, physiology, and training adaptations.

One of the fundamental areas of investigation pertains to sex disparities in strength, power, and hypertrophy. Historically, it’s been well-established that males, on average, exhibit greater absolute strength and muscle mass compared to females. This discrepancy often traces its roots back to inherent physiological distinctions.

However, when it comes to responses to strength and hypertrophy training, the narrative becomes more nuanced. Research indicates that, when individuals of both sexes follow matched resistance training protocols, the relative improvements in strength and hypertrophy are quite similar.

So, do women need to be trained differently than men? The answer, it appears, is not as much as one might assume. The principles of progressive overload, specificity, and other training fundamentals remain constant. While individualization is key, the idea of drastically distinct training guidelines based on sex lacks compelling empirical support.

The guest in this episode, Dr. David Nolan, is a researcher in the area of sex differences in exercise response, and has looked at the influences of menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use in female athletes on their performance.

In this episode, we discuss the research to date, and what this means practically for athletes and coaches.

Guest Information

David Nolan, PhD

David Nolan is an Assistant Professor of Sport and Exercise Science at Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland.

David investigates sex-related considerations in athletic development with specific focus on female athletes. His mixed-methods research is conducted through the lens of women’s rugby, examining unique challenges and considerations for the female athlete, including researching the role of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives in athletic preparation.


  • Sexual Dimorphism in Physiology
  • Gap in Representation in Exercise Science Research
  • Sex Differences in Strength, Power and Hypertrophy
  • Responses to Strength & Hypertrophy Training
  • Do Women Need to Be Trained Differently to Men?
  • Menstrual Cycle & Performance
  • Hormonal Contraceptive Use on Muscle Hypertrophy, Power and Strength Adaptations

Premium Content

You’re currently logged-in as a Premium subscriber. Access you content below.

You are currently not signed-in as a Premium subscriber.

To view our Premium content, please to your account or subscribe to Premium.

Not a Premium subscriber? Subscribe here!

Leave a Comment